Asia stocks climb tracking Wall St rally; Nikkei hits record high, China GDP beats
The past three weeks produced a rare divergence that macro desks usually only get during true regime shifts. As the Bitcoin vs. S&P 500 performance spread widened, crypto absorbed a leverage reset while equities stayed comparatively steady. That gap has turned into a live test of whether this is a contained washout or the first phase of a broader market risk reassessment in 2026.
The Drop in Numbers
Bitcoin’s last cycle high was set in early October 2025, a peak just above $125,000. VanEck’s postmortem frames the February move as a drawdown approaching a 50% peak-to-trough decline, with BTC down 47.5% at the time of writing.
By February 5, 2026, Bitcoin had dropped below $70,000 as forced deleveraging accelerated.
The sell-off was not isolated to BTC. Bloomberg estimates total crypto market value slumped by $467.6 billion since Jan. 29, as the rout intensified into early February.
This is where the crypto vs. traditional markets framing matters. Equities did not face a comparable forced-unwind dynamic, and that difference shows up in the cross-asset spread.
Anatomy of a Crypto Liquidation Cascade
VanEck’s breakdown is specific to the plumbing. Over the past week into February 5, crypto markets saw roughly $3 to $4 billion in total liquidations, with an estimated $2 to $2.5 billion concentrated in Bitcoin futures. That is a leverage flush, not a single-exchange failure.
Open interest rolled over hard. VanEck estimates BTC futures open interest fell from roughly $61 billion one week earlier to about $49 billion on February 5, a decline of more than 20% in notional exposure.
That is the cleanest description of Bitcoin deleveraging in real numbers. It also explains why derivatives leverage crypto market conditions that can tighten fast even without a new “fundamental” headline.
Speed was the tell. On February 5, Bitcoin registered a -6.05σ move on VanEck’s rate-of-change Z-score, placing it among the fastest single-day crashes in crypto history by their metric set.
That is exactly the kind of move that exposes liquidity stress on crypto exchanges. When depth is thin, forced closures turn a normal sell program into a disorderly pocket, and crypto market structure stress becomes visible in the tape.
Institutional Flows in Crypto and the Correlation Problem
The demand side did not help. US spot Bitcoin ETFs have seen roughly $4.5 billion of outflows so far in 2026, extending a multi-week drain.
CoinShares’ weekly reporting also captured a heavy outflow print of $1.7 billion for digital asset investment products in early February, with coverage pointing back to the CoinShares flow note.
The BTC-US500 correlation story matters here because correlation can break for the wrong reason. The spread can widen not because Bitcoin becomes defensive, but because crypto loses marginal buyers while equities still have a structural bid.
One real-time proxy for that was the Coinbase premium signal. CoinDesk reported the Coinbase Bitcoin Premium Index stayed negative for a record 40 days as of February 24, implying persistent US-side sell pressure versus global pricing.
When that stays negative alongside ETF outflows, the BTC/US500 comparison starts to reflect flow mechanics, not just “risk appetite.”
Why Equities Held
Part of the divergence is simply that equities were not clearing leverage the way crypto was. Citi set a year-end 2026 target of 7,700 for the S&P 500, driven by an earnings view of $320 per share.
On valuations, Bank of America has argued the index remains expensive on 18 of 20 valuation metrics, even after volatility.
That combination helps explain stock market resilience in a world where crypto is still digesting forced risk reduction. It is also why bitcoin vs. stock market resilience has looked asymmetric through February.
This does not mean crypto stock market resilience is “broken.” It means the transmission mechanism is different. Equities can grind on earnings narratives. Crypto often trades the funding and leverage layer first.
Isolated Flush or Macro Warning Signal?
This is the core 200 million versus trade BTC US$500 question. Is crypto simply flushing internal leverage while equities remain supported, or is the crypto move signaling a broader repricing of liquidity and policy risk?
Two policy threads were live during the window:
- The Supreme Court ruled that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose tariffs, reshaping the legal footing of the tariff channel and injecting new uncertainty into the policy path.
- Donald Trump nominated Kevin Warsh as the next Fed chair on Jan. 30, 2026, a move Reuters described as hawkish-leaning in market interpretation.
That backdrop reinforces why risk-off sentiment can hit crypto harder and earlier. Economic policy uncertainty has also been elevated in the data. The standard reference series is the US Economic Policy Uncertainty Index, published and distributed via FRED.
Taken together, the divergence can still be read two ways:
- A contained, internal reset: VanEck explicitly frames the move as orderly deleveraging rather than capitulation, with leverage reduced meaningfully and liquidations large but not “climactic.”
- A macro tell: if policy uncertainty stays high and institutional flows remain negative, the risk asset comparison between BTC vs S&P 500 could start to look less like decoupling and more like a lead-lag stress signal.
Either way, this is now a live BTC vs. US500 and BTC vs. S&P 500 watch, not a finished postmortem.
What the Bitcoin vs. S&P 500 Chart Is Saying Now
As of late February, the picture remains straightforward: Bitcoin stabilized in the mid-$60,000s after the forced unwind window described by VanEck, while equities remain near recent highs.
The key signal is whether the gap in crypto vs. equities performance narrows via organic spot demand returning or widens again through renewed leverage and continued outflows. For positioning desks, the macro trade bitcoin vs. S&P 500 is less about calling direction and more about watching how liquidity, leverage, and flows interact across BTC vs. US500 regimes.